Most Important IDF Ground Weapon – The Merkava Tank – Is in Trouble!
August 16, 2007
http://www.tribulationperiod/
The Merkava 3 and 4 Tanks are probably the best main Ground Weapons in the Israeli IDF Inventory. The Merkava 5 is not yet in main line Production. Hizbullah’s use of Russian tank piercing, shoulder-launched missiles during last year’s war with Israel, was devastating to the drive of Israel into southern Lebanon. Since that time even more sophisticated armor piercing anti-tank missiles have flooded into Syria and Hizbullah. The Israelis have spared no effort to thicken the armor on their Merkava tank series. Their Tank Corps were the spearhead of their 1967 and 1973 wars.
The following lengthy paragraph, with two Scriptures, was issued on September 1, 2003 on our Web Site.
It deals with Merkava tanks. I changed the future
tenses on it to past
tense on this Blog.
I was surprised by some armor decisions made four years ago by former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who was the Treasury Minister in Ariel Sharon’s Cabinet. He believed Israel faces two threats – The Palestinian terrorist groups, and the weapons of mass destruction
that are being developed by Arab states in the Middle East, notably headed by Iran. Of course, both of these are real threats, but I do not agree with his statement that followed. He does not believe the threat of an invasion by Arab states against Israel on the ground is a feasible reality
and, because of this, favors the decommissioning of old war systems, like the Merkava tanks, at an accelerated rate.
Netanyahu attributes great importance to the strategic view, which would provide answers to the Iranian nuclear threat and to other state’s weapons of mass destruction. He favors the continuation of the security fence to its completion, but desires to see the discontinuation of Merkava tank production.
If Israel does follow this program, believing they are secure from an outside ground attack at the present, then once they finally get the Palestinians fenced in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, it will give them a sense of “peace and safety” as regards their being overrun from the north. Scripture indicates it will happen. Without the conventional old war systems, such as the Merkava 3 and the new Merkava 4 tanks, Israel would be much more vulnerable to a conventional attack like the one launched against them from Syria in the 1973 Yom Kipper War. The deterrent to non-conventional weapons, now being developed by the Arab states, lies in the Negev wilderness in the form of nuclear, chemical, and biological warheads on the hundreds of Jericho missiles found there. The mass destruction weapons possessed by Israel in the Negev are more than a sufficient deterrent to cause the Arab states not to launch theirs against Israel. When Israel truly believes it has attained peace and safety, then a conventional war attack will be launched against it from the north.
I Thessalonians 5:3,4 – For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.
[4] But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief.
Ezekiel 38:14,15 – Therefore, son of man, prophesy and say unto Gog, Thus saith the Lord God; In that day when my people of Israel dwelleth safely, shalt thou not know it? [15] And thou shalt come from thy place out of the north parts, thou, and many people with thee, all of them riding upon horses, a great company, and a mighty army:
Begin Jerusalem Post Article
Iran has Merkava-breaching missile
HILLARY LEILA KRIEGER, JPost Correspondent, JPost Staff, THE JERUSALEM POST
August 15, 2007
Iran has developed a missile that can penetrate the armor of an Israeli-made Merkava tank and a US-made Abrams tank, the commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, Yayha Rahim Safavi, said Wednesday.
He also said Iran has land-to-sea missiles that can hit any ship in the Persian Gulf.
The Iranian news agency Fars quoted Safavi as saying the Iranian-made Shihab-3 missile, which has a range of 2,000 kilometers, recently was equipped with a remote guidance system that allows it to be controlled even after its launch.
Meanwhile, Israeli officials in Washington welcomed reports Wednesday that the United States is set to brand the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps a terrorist entity, saying the move could help dislocate “the strategic backbone” of the regime in Teheran.
The move, which the administration has yet to make official or to publicly confirm, ratchets up the pressure on Iran and indicates the US is willing to act unilaterally to stop Teheran’s nuclear program.
Placing the Revolutionary Guards on its list of terrorist organizations – the first time a national military entity would receive such a designation – would cut it off from the US financial system.
Any assets that it, its members or subsidiaries may have in US jurisdictions would be frozen.
Though the Revolutionary Guards isn’t thought to have many assets in the US, the terrorist label could help convince European and Asian entities to curtail their connections with it and its businesses, though many analysts expect Europe and Asia to resist such pressure.
“The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps are central to the whole exporting of the Iranian revolution,” said an Israeli source in Washington, pointing to the Revolutionary Guards’ involvement in sending arms and other resources to Hizbullah in Lebanon and to terrorist cells around the world. “That sort of designation will have an important impact on what they can do, where they do it, who is involved with them.”
The US accuses the Revolutionary Guards’ foreign operations arm, the Quds Force – which may be the only part of the organization to get the terrorist designation from the US – of supporting insurgents in Iraq and the Taliban in Afghanistan.
An elite military unit with an estimated 125,000 troops, the Revolutionary Guards also has its own air and naval forces, as well as interests in many major Iranian industries.
US State Department spokesman Sean McCormack, who wouldn’t confirm the terrorist designation, referred to the Revolutionary Guards as “a state within a state,” with “tentacles into all sorts of different activities, into business activities, into banking activities.”
An official in the Iranian Foreign Ministry condemned the move, calling it “propaganda.”
The timing of the terrorist designation, which would be made under an executive order US President George W. Bush signed after the September 11, 2001, attacks, would likely coincide with deliberations at the United Nations over further sanctions against Iran, which has rejected two previous Security Council resolutions demanding that it halt enrichment of uranium.
“The move reflects that there is a lot of frustration that the diplomacy isn’t yielding results,” said Ray Takeyh, a US expert on Middle East policy at the Council on Foreign Relations in Washington.
White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said the US was committed to the diplomatic track and any move on terrorist designation shouldn’t be seen as paving the way for the use of force.
“All of our efforts are focused on the diplomatic actions that we are working through,” she said. “Military action is not being contemplated.”
But analysts said the move would signal to Iran that the US was ready to take action against the Revolutionary Guards at some time in the future.
“Once they get classified as terrorist, American institutions will have the legitimacy they need to fight the Revolutionary Guards,” said Mustafa Alani, a terrorism expert at the Gulf Research Center in Dubai.
“If this is a terrorist organization and it fires missiles in the Gulf, then the US would have an obligation to fight the Guards,” he said. But, with American forces tied down in Iraq, Alani said he did not expect the US to take any such steps soon.
AP contributed to this Report
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.