Jew Triangle Affair with no Love,
Faces World Wanting to See a Dove,
But Peace Dove to Israel is from Above,
Peres’ decision into War Israel will Shove!
February 16, 2009
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Shimon Peres is about to become involved in making a decision which will strongly influence the future Israeli government, the one likely to be the one in power when a false peace truce is reached with its enemies, a truce that will be suddenly broken by the Arabs in a vicious Israeli killing Jihad attack from the north, and from the Palestinians inside Israel. It is a very ironic decision in that we now see three right wing parties, which range from moderate right to right to extreme right, about to receive guidance from perhaps the greatest liberal politician in Israel.
It is an appropriate scenario for the end of the Age of the Gentiles – A far left liberal Gentile President in America making decisions for a non-liberal majority, and a far left liberal President in Israel also making decisions for a non-liberal majority.
I wonder if history from AD 70 isn’t about to be repeated in Israel at some point in time between 2010 and 2015, with the excerption that this time Israel will not be dispersed into all nations, but into the Negev Wilderness for 1260 days?
Luke 21:23,24 – But woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck, in those days!
for there shall be great distress in the land, and wrath upon this people.
[24] And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.
Could Revelation 12:6 be a repeat of AD 70 for the present Israeli generation?
Revelation 12:6 – And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days.
And, at the end of the 1260 days, could this be the Second Advent of the Jewish Messiah, Jesus Christ who comes out of Heavenly Zion to save Israel? Is the 2000 year spiritual blindness of Israel about to end in the Negev Wilderness?
Romans 11:25-27 – For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. [26] And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob: [27] For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
Could this be the Heavenly Deliverer coming down out of Heavenly Zion to fulfill God’s covenant of grace in Him?
Luke 21:25-28 – And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring; [26] Men’s hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken. [27] And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. [28] And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh.
For me, there is no wondering, could, or maybe, only a question of WHEN, and I believe the WHEN of the initial attack is very likely to occur at some point in time between 2010 and 2015. All the events in Israel are now aligning for the eventual attack, which will eventually lead to the final great battle of Armageddon.
Begin Excerpt from Haaretz
Not only in his handkerchief
February 16, 2009
By Ze’ev Segar
The Israeli presidency’s symbolic role drove the post’s first occupant, Chaim Weizmann, to say bitterly that the only place he could stick his nose was his handkerchief. Nevertheless, the president has two important powers: pardoning criminals and deciding whom to ask to form a government. His responsibility for establishing the government, along with the need for his consent should a prime minister seek to dissolve the Knesset, occasionally put the president at the center of the public/political stage.
The Basic Law on Government, which dictates the procedure for establishing a government, gives the president broad discretion. All it requires is that he consult with representatives of every party elected to the Knesset before deciding who should form the government.
Not only is the president immune to the dictates of 61 or more Knesset members, he is also
immune to judicial review by the High Court of Justice.
As far back as the early 1950s, the court, responding to a petition against president Weizmann by MK Ari Jabotinsky, ruled that the way the president exercises his discretion may not be adjudicated. In that case, Weizmann’s refusal to ask another MK to form a government after David Ben-Gurion resigned led to elections.
Last November, it was President Shimon Peres’ announcement that he saw no possibility of forming a government after Tzipi Livni fai led to do so that
led to elections. And even today, it is hard to completely rule out the possibility of another election, given the complicated tangle after the most recent one.
The fact that Kadima is the largest faction in the 18th Knesset, with 28 MKs versus Likud’s 27, does not obligate Peres to choose its chairwoman to form the government. The president must consider who has the best chance of quickly establishing a stable government that will pass a confidence vote in the Knesset. Only in the second stage of the process, if the first candidate fails to form a government and the president sees no point in assigning the job to another MK, can 61 MKs force the president to give the job to an MK of their choosing. This article of the law leads to the conclusion that in the first stage – where we are now – the president is not bound by the numbers.
The Basic Law allows for the task of forming a government to be assigned to only one MK, who will serve as the prime minister. It does not allow for appointing two MKs to serve as premier in rotation. But the law does not prohibit a quasi-conditional mandate, one that would urge the MK who forms the government to forge as broad a coalition as possible for the sake of governmental stability.
The president’s apolitical role need not prevent Peres from expressing public support for a broad, stable government, nor
need it prevent him from intervening in the process to help forge agreements among the various parties, blocs and interests.
There is a successful precedent for this: President Haim Herzog played an active role in forging the rotation government headed alternately by Peres and Yitzhak Shamir in the 1980s, and that was one of the few Israeli governments that managed to serve out its full term.
The purpose of the Basic Law on Government is to ensure that a government is formed as quickly as possible, in order to shorten the tenure of the transition government, which does not enjoy the Knesset’s confidence and must exercise its authority “with caution and restraint,” in the High Court’s words. The law grants the president – who, according to the Basic Law on the President, is the head of state – broad discretion, for the sake of the public welfare. And this welfare requires governmental stability – not a paper government that will survive only for a short time.
Thus Peres now faces a public task of supreme importance: trying to form a stable government that will include both large parties, Kadima and Likud.
Such a government would reflect the will of a significant majority of the public. And it would not stand or fall on a single vote.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.